GCSE English Tutors in Reading: Language and Literature by the Numbers

GCSE English Language and GCSE English Literature are two separate qualifications, each with its own entries and its own results. In Reading in 2024/25, 1,610 entries were recorded for English Language and 57% reached grade 5 or above; 1,563 entries for English Literature reached 60% at grade 5 or above, a higher pass rate on fewer entries, according to Department for Education data.

Why English Language and English Literature Are Two Different GCSEs

"GCSE English" is not one exam. English Language and English Literature are separate specifications, sat as separate papers, with separate entry counts and separate results — a pupil can pass one and fail the other, and a school can enter every pupil for both or leave a handful off one of them. That distinction matters more here than in most subjects, because three different English measures inside the Department for Education's own data get routinely conflated, and getting them right changes what a Reading result actually tells you.

Inside Attainment 8, English is double-weighted, but only under a specific condition. The Department for Education's own guidance is explicit: "If a pupil sits both English language and English literature, the higher grade is double-weighted. The lower grade can count in the 'open' bucket of these measures. If only GCSE English literature or English language is taken, then this qualification will count but will not be double-weighted." A school's English Attainment 8 sub-score, in other words, is not simply "the English grade" — it depends on whether a pupil sat one paper or both.

The EBacc average point score applies a stricter rule again: "For English results to be included in the EBacc APS calculation, pupils must sit both English language and English literature. The better grade counts towards EBacc APS." A pupil who sits only Language, however well they do, contributes nothing to their school's EBacc English score.

The headline "grade 5 or above in English and maths" measure — the figure most often quoted as if it were a single English result — is looser than either of those. DfE's guidance states it plainly: "A pupil needs to achieve a grade 5 or above in either English literature or English language. There is no requirement to sit both." The same rule applies at grade 4 or above. So a school's published "English and maths" rate can be met by a pupil's Literature grade alone, with no Language result entering the calculation at all — which is exactly why the entries and grades for each subject, taken separately, tell you more than the combined measure ever will.

How Do Reading's GCSE English Language Results Compare With England's?

Reading is a small, single-tier local authority — DfE code 870 — and its English Language results have not moved in a straight line against the national average. The Department for Education's own seven-year run of data shows Reading and England starting level, diverging sharply through the pandemic years, and settling into a narrower, more specific gap than the borough's GCSE maths results show over the same period.

In 2018/19, Reading and England were tied exactly at 53% for grade 5 or above in English Language — there was no Reading lead to speak of before the pandemic, unlike the borough's maths results, which already led nationally that year. Through the two exam-cancellation years, when centre-assessed and teacher-assessed grades briefly replaced written papers, Reading's rate rose further than England's: 67% against 63% in 2020/21, the widest gap in the whole run. Once written exams returned, the gap narrowed again rather than holding. By 2024/25, Reading's grade 5+ rate of 57% sits three points above England's 54% — a real but modest lead, and at grade 4 or above the two have converged almost exactly, both landing at 70%. A Reading pupil's chance of reaching a bare pass in English Language is now statistically close to the national picture; the borough's advantage shows up mainly at the higher grade 5 threshold, not across the board.

Do Fewer Reading Pupils Sit English Literature Than English Language?

Yes, and the gap is real rather than a rounding artefact. In 2024/25, Reading recorded 1,610 GCSE English Language entries against 1,563 for English Literature — 47 fewer, a difference of just under 3%. That is not how a compulsory-subject pair usually behaves: pupils are required to study English throughout key stage 4, but a school is free to enter a pupil for Language without Literature, and the borough-wide total shows some schools doing exactly that.

What makes the comparison genuinely counter-intuitive is that Literature's pass rate is higher than Language's, on those fewer entries. Reading's grade 5-or-above rate was 60% for English Literature against 57% for English Language in 2024/25, and 74% against 70% at grade 4 or above. A borough-wide summary that quotes "English" as a single figure — as most competitor pages that reference GCSE results at all tend to do — obscures a distinction that runs the opposite way from what might be assumed: the smaller-entry subject is not the weaker one here.

The pattern is not new. Across every year from 2018/19 to 2024/25, Reading's Literature entries have tracked below its Language entries in most years, and Literature's grade 5+ rate has matched or exceeded Language's in five of the seven years — a two-point lead in 2018/19 (55% against 53%), a tie in 2021/22 (63% each), and clear leads in each of the three most recent years: 59% against 57% in 2022/23, 58% against 57% in 2023/24, and 60% against 57% in 2024/25. The two years it trailed were both pandemic-affected, when centre-assessed and teacher-assessed grading lifted Language further: 60% against 61% in 2019/20 and 66% against 67% in 2020/21. The two subjects are correlated, because most pupils who take one take the other, but they are not identical, and a programme built around "English" without separating the two is working from an average that neither subject's own figures quite support.

Which Reading School Gets the Strongest GCSE English Results?

DfE does not publish a simple "percentage achieving grade 5 in English" at individual school level in the same form it uses for local authorities. The closest sourced equivalent is each school's English Attainment 8 sub-score — a 0-to-18 point scale, because English is double-weighted for a pupil who sits both Language and Literature. Comparing that sub-score across Reading's nine state secondaries produces a genuinely different ranking from the borough's GCSE maths results.

Kendrick School's English sub-score of 16.9 is the highest of any Reading state secondary — ahead of Reading School's 15.5, even though our own GCSE maths results for Reading show Reading School ahead of Kendrick on that subject, 17.1 to 16.6. The two grammar schools swap places depending on which subject is being measured, which is a useful reminder that "the selective schools do better" is not the same claim as "the selective schools do better at everything, in the same order." Both schools admit through a selective entrance test at 11, so part of their lead over the rest of the borough reflects intake rather than teaching alone — a distinction worth stating once and moving on from, not hedging into every sentence that follows.

Among the non-selective schools, Reading Girls' School's 11.2 sits above the Reading LA average of 10.4 and the England average of 9.8 — a stronger relative position in English than in maths, where its 10.2 sub-score landed almost exactly on the LA average. Blessed Hugh Faringdon Catholic School's English sub-score of 10.2 also sits above its own maths sub-score of 8.5, overtaking Highdown's 10.3 by less than a point once English rather than maths is the measure. King's Academy Prospect's 7.7 is the lowest in the borough in English, as it is in maths, from a cohort of 205 pupils.

What Parents Say

DP

Deborah Prior

★★★★★

Confidence and progress

My son was low in confidence after COVID and the gaps in learning were building up. Using this service helped plug those gaps, rebuild confidence, and improve his ability to learn properly again.

NI

Nicola

★★★★★

Amazing tutors!

We arranged maths and English tuition ahead of GCSEs and both tutors were brilliant. My daughter's grades improved, and by results day she achieved two grades higher than in her mock exams.

S

Saifan Khan

★★★★★

Great Teaching and Focused Learning

I attended an English bootcamp with Leading Tuition and the experience was excellent. The teacher gave focused attention to the small group while keeping the lessons interactive and engaging.

See more reviews on Trustpilot

Where the Language-Literature Entry Gap Shows Up, School by School

The borough-wide 47-entry gap between English Language and English Literature is not spread evenly across Reading's nine schools. At six of them, the two subjects' entries match exactly, meaning every pupil who sat one sat the other. At three, a real gap opens up.

Reading School, Kendrick, Reading Girls' School, Blessed Hugh Faringdon, The Wren School and UTC Reading each entered exactly as many pupils for Literature as for Language — a matched entry policy, at least for the cohort that sat exams in 2024/25. Maiden Erlegh and King's Academy Prospect show modest gaps of 20 and 3 entries. Highdown's gap of 62 is the largest by a wide margin, and its own numbers need a caveat: 298 English Language entries is more than the school's 248-pupil Attainment 8 cohort, which means the subjects-entered count and the Attainment 8 pupil count are drawn from different DfE tables with different inclusion rules — the entries figure counts exams sat, including early or repeat entries, and is not simply a headcount of Highdown's Year 11. That is a reason to read entries as entries, not as pupils, rather than a reason to distrust either number; DfE's own subjects-entered table is titled "Total number of entries" for exactly this reason.

What This Means When Choosing GCSE English Support in Reading

The practical consequence of all of this is that "GCSE English tutoring" is really two decisions, not one. A pupil can be secure in English Language's non-fiction comprehension and transactional writing while still finding the sustained literary analysis that Literature papers demand genuinely difficult, or the other way round — a strong close-reader who has not yet built the more mechanical language-paper skills of summarising, comparing and structuring an argument to a tight word count. Reading's own entries data shows schools making exactly this kind of differentiated decision at the point of entry; a tutoring programme should make it at the point of teaching.

Leading Tuition treats GCSE English Language and GCSE English Literature as what they are on the exam timetable — two subjects, with two sets of papers, two mark schemes and two working grades to track — rather than folding them into one generic "English" plan built around a single average. For the exam board specifics and paper structure in more depth, our main GCSE English tuition page covers both specifications. If your child is earlier in their Reading school career, our guide to 11+ tuition in Reading covers the entrance tests that Reading School and Kendrick set well before pupils reach the GCSE results shown above, and our guide to Reading School's admissions covers that school's own catchment and process in detail.

Frequently Asked Questions